HealthcareComplex automationSeveral jobs working together: multi-stage pipelines with state, branching on rules or AI decisions, approvals or escalations, 4+ systems, AI agents that act, or reconciliation across sources. Usually rolled out in stages.

Insurance claims that chase themselves

For: Multi-practitioner clinic

Typical impact

Denied claims down 60%

Every submitted claim is tracked automatically: status checked, missing documents flagged, denials turned into corrected resubmissions within days — and an always-current aging report shows exactly where the money is.

Typical results

31 days

average time to payment, down from 52

100%

of claim statuses checked on schedule

Live

aging report shows exactly where the money is

Figures reflect typical results for this kind of automation.

The challenge

The billing clerk juggled hundreds of open claims in spreadsheets. Statuses were checked only when someone remembered, denials sat unnoticed past resubmission windows, and a meaningful share of earned revenue was simply written off.

Before and after

Before With the automation

Average days to payment

−40%
52 days
31 days

Denied or expired claims per month

−60%
25 claims
10 claims

Hours tracking claims per week

−83%
12 hrs
2 hrs

The automation

We automated the follow-up cycle: claim statuses are polled on schedule, payments are posted and matched automatically, and every denial opens a task with the denial reason, the patient file and a prefilled correction checklist. Claims approaching their deadline escalate to the clinic manager before it's too late.

How it works

  1. 01

    Claim submitted

    Every submitted claim enters the automated follow-up cycle.

  2. 02

    Status polled on schedule

    Claim statuses are checked automatically — no one has to remember.

  3. 03

    Payments matched

    Incoming payments are posted and matched to their claims.

  4. 04

    Denials become tasks

    Every denial opens a task with the reason, the patient file and a prefilled correction checklist.

  5. 05

    Resubmitted within days

    Corrected claims go back out inside the resubmission window, and the aging report stays current.

Starts from

  • Submitted claims
  • Payer responses

Delivers

  • Denial tasks
  • Payments posted
  • Aging report

The impact

Denied and expired claims dropped by about sixty percent, average time-to-payment fell from fifty-two to thirty-one days, and the clinic recovered revenue that used to disappear quietly into the write-off column.

Questions about this automation

How are claim statuses checked?

A scheduled job queries each open claim's status through the payer portal, a clearinghouse or the billing system's API, usually once a day. Every status change is written back to the claim record, so the billing team works from current information instead of logging into portals one claim at a time.

What does a denial task include?

Each denial opens a task with the denial reason code, the patient file, the original claim and a prefilled correction checklist for that reason, such as a missing authorization number or a wrong procedure code. The task carries the resubmission deadline, and claims nearing it escalate to the clinic manager.

How are payments matched to claims?

Remittance files from payers are read automatically, and each payment line is matched to its claim by claim number, patient and amount. Exact matches are posted, while partial or unmatched payments are flagged for review. The aging report updates from the same data. This is a multi-step build, usually rolled out in stages.

Healthcare

Related automation examples

View all 60 examples

Want this in your business?

We map it to the tools you already use and show you where it saves the most time, in a free 30-minute call.