TechnologyComplex automationSeveral jobs working together: multi-stage pipelines with state, branching on rules or AI decisions, approvals or escalations, 4+ systems, AI agents that act, or reconciliation across sources. Usually rolled out in stages.

Every departing employee's access revoked in minutes, with proof

For: SaaS company preparing for ISO 27001

Typical impact

Full revocation in 15 minutes

Preparing for ISO 27001, a SaaS company found departed employees' accounts still active weeks after exit. We built a sequenced revocation triggered by the HR system — every account across 22 tools goes dark in 15 minutes, with a timestamped audit log as proof.

Typical results

22

Tools revoked automatically

0

Stale accounts in last audit

100%

Departures fully logged

Figures reflect typical results for this kind of automation.

The challenge

Offboarding ran on a checklist nobody owned. IT revoked SSO when the ticket arrived, but code repositories, cloud consoles and third-party tools lagged for days — a pre-audit review found 47 accounts belonging to people who had already left. With ISO 27001 certification approaching, the forgotten-account gap was both a security risk and a guaranteed audit finding.

Before and after

Before With the automation

IT time per departure

−94%
240 min
15 min

Stale accounts found in audit

−100%
47 accounts
0 accounts

Departures with complete audit log

0%
100%

The automation

We made the termination date in the HR system the single trigger for a sequenced revocation: SSO first, then code repositories, cloud consoles and 22 third-party tools, each step confirmed before the next runs. Owned documents, repositories and scheduled jobs are reassigned to the manager so nothing breaks, any tool that fails to confirm pages IT immediately, and every action is written to a timestamped audit log filed per departure.

How it works

  1. 01

    HR date is the trigger

    The termination date in the HR system starts the sequence automatically — same-day exits included.

  2. 02

    Revocation runs in order

    SSO first, then code repositories, cloud consoles and 22 third-party tools — each revocation confirmed before the next step runs.

  3. 03

    Resources reassigned, not lost

    Owned documents, repositories and scheduled jobs transfer to the manager, so nothing breaks when the account closes.

  4. 04

    Proof generated automatically

    Every action lands in a timestamped audit log filed per departure — exactly the evidence ISO 27001 auditors ask for.

  5. 05

    Exceptions page a human

    Any system that fails to confirm revocation alerts IT immediately instead of failing silently.

Starts from

  • HR termination date
  • Access inventory

Delivers

  • Access revoked across the stack
  • Owned resources reassigned
  • Timestamped audit log

The impact

Full revocation now completes in 15 minutes instead of dragging on for days, and IT effort per departure fell from four hours to a 15-minute log review. Quarterly access reviews typically find zero stale accounts instead of dozens, and the timestamped logs give an ISO 27001 assessor the access-control evidence they usually ask for.

Questions about this automation

Why does the revocation run in a fixed order?

SSO is closed first, so the person cannot sign in anywhere new, and then code repositories, cloud consoles and third-party tools follow. Each step must confirm before the next runs. The order also leaves time to transfer owned documents, repositories and scheduled jobs to the manager before an account is removed.

What if one of the tools fails to revoke access?

Any system that does not confirm the revocation alerts IT right away instead of failing silently. The alert names the tool, the account and the error, and the audit log keeps that step open until someone resolves it. That way no departure is marked complete while an account is still active.

Will the audit log satisfy an ISO 27001 assessor?

The log records every action with a timestamp, the system involved and its confirmation, filed per departure. That is the kind of evidence an assessor usually asks for when reviewing access control. The automation produces the record; the company's own policies and the assessor's review still decide the audit outcome.

Technology

Related automation examples

View all 60 examples

Want this in your business?

We map it to the tools you already use and show you where it saves the most time, in a free 30-minute call.